Legal Opinion

Wenger v. Aceto

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 27, 2008PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

The plaintiff, a physician, filed a complaint in the Superior Court seeking damages against the defendant, his former attorney, for malicious prosecution (count one); abuse of process (count two); and violations of G. L. c. 93A (count three). The defendant filed a special motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to G. L. c. 231, § 59H, commonly known as the “anti-SLAPP”1 law. The special motion was denied by a judge in the Superior Court. The defendant appealed from that denial, and we transferred the case here on our own motion. See Fabre v. Walton, 436 Mass. 517, 520-522 (2002),…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Duracraft Corp. v. Holmes Products Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  4. Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Office One, Inc. v. LopezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Polay v. McMahonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hospital, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  3. North American Expositions Co. v. CorcoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  4. Giuffrida v. High Country Investor, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  5. Nader v. Maine Democratic PartySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API