Legal Opinion

Long v. Harrison

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 16, 1922PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sims, J.,

after making the foregoing statement, delivered the following opinion of the court:

*441The question upon which the decision of this case turns is as follows:

1. Were the judgments, and the notes upon which they were entered, obtained by the defendants by fraud by the use of undue influence upon M. A. Long, the maker of the notes, exerted either directly by the defendants themselves or indirectly through others in conspiracy with the defendants to defraud the said Long?

The question must be answered in the affirmative.

The law applicable is well settled and, indeed, is not the subject of any…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fishburne & Wife v. Ferguson's HeirsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
  2. Hickman's Ex'or v. TroutSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
  3. Hazlewood v. ForrerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MosbySupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  5. Ferguson & Co. v. DaughtreySupreme Court of Virginia · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. FergusonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
  2. Cook v. HaydenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
  3. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  4. Millboro Lumber Co. v. Augusta Wood Products Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  5. Friendly Ice Cream Corp. v. BecknerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API