Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Mosby

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 16, 1896PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Chancery Court of the city of Richmond, pronounced May 8,1894, in a suit in chancery, wherein the appellee was the complainant, and the appellant was the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

*94Pending his action for damages, the plaintiff, who was conductor of a freight train on the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway, and while thus engaged was seriously injured in a collision, has instituted this suit in chancery to set aside a release of all claim for damages suffered by him in that accident, on the ground that, at the time of executing said release, he was mentally incompetent, and that the defendant company took advantage of his incapacity to procure the release. The case was heard by the chancellor without the intervention of a jury, upon depositions only; and the petition for appeal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Greer v. GreersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1852

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bowie v. SorrellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
  2. Coward v. Wellmont Health SystemSupreme Court of Virginia · 2018
  3. Mansfield v. BERNABEISupreme Court of Virginia · 2012
  4. Shacklett v. RollerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
  5. Price's v. BarhamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API