Hickman's Ex'or v. Trout
Supreme Court of Virginia
Argued at Staunton. Decided at Wytheville. Appeal from decree of circuit court of Shenandoah •county, rendered April 10th, 1885, in the chancery suit wherein Jíohn T. Hickman’s executor and George A. Hupp are complainants, and Isaac Trout and James S. Trout are defendants. At the hearing the circuit court dismissed the bill with costs, and the complainants obtained an appeal and supersedeas. Opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.
The object of this suit, brought in April, 1873, was to set aside as fraudulent and void, a deed executed February 5th, 1872, and acknowledged March 7th, 1873, by the grantor, the said Isaac Trout, and recorded March 28th, 1873, and purporting to convey to the said James S. Trout all the grantor’s real estate for the professed consideration of $3,000, whereof $500 is recited to have been paid in hand, $500 evidenced by bond payable on demand, and the residue evidenced by four bonds, each for $500, payable in four, six, eight, and nine years, respectively, with interest from their dates; and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Knight v. CapitoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
- Garland v. RivesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1826
- Johnson v. Wagner & SonsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1882
- Martin v. RexroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by37 opinions
- Hutcheson v. Savings Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Va. Fire & Marine Ins. v. CottrellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
- Todd v. SykesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
- Cochran v. ParisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
- Moore v. Manson (In Re Springfield Furniture, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.