Legal Opinion

Republic Indemnity Co. v. Schofield

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 5, 1996No. A070851PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PARRILLI, J.

Does an employer’s liability policy designating a corporation as the sole named insured automatically extend “named insured” status to the corporation’s officers, directors and employees? We conclude it does not.

Appellants filed a cross-complaint against Republic Indemnity Company of America (Republic) and others for breach of insurance contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Republic on the ground appellants were not “named insureds” within the meaning of the Republic policies. We agree with…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. La Jolla Beach & Tennis Club, Inc. v. Industrial Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Barnett v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Seretti v. Superior National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Boyer v. JensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. USF Insurance v. Clarendon America InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
  5. Bleavins v. DemarestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API