Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Britton

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 4, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, J.

This is an action .for the conversion of five cows and three heifers. Trial was by court, judgment was for the defendant, and the plaintiff comes here upon exceptions.

On April 9, 1936, the plaintiff and his wife leased their farm in Hartland, together with certain personal property, including fifteen cows, seventeen yearlings and three two-year-old heifers, to Albert Roy and Antoinette Hebert for the term of five years, beginning June 1, 1936, at an annual rental payable in monthly instalments to be taken out of the milk checks. The lease was duly recorded in the Hartland land records. Among…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rogers v. WhitneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  2. Vermont & Canada Railroad v. Vermont Central RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1861
  3. Barker v. Troy & Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855
  4. Douglass & Varnum v. Village of MorrisvilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  5. White & Hammond v. AmsdenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bissonnette v. WylieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. Howard v. Maple Leaf Farm Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. Gannon v. Quechee Lakes Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API