Legal Opinion
Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. v. Ingenito
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 22, 2015No. 2:14-cv-01038-TLN-EFBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO THE YOUNGER DOCTRINE
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendants Jackie Lacey, Bonnie Dumanis, Jan Scully and Michael Ramos’s1 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Fedex *1123Ground Package Systems, Inc.’s (“Fedex”) Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and the abstention doctrine.2 (ECF No. 13.) In addition, Defendant Miriam Barcellona Ingénito,3 acting Director of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (“DTSC Director”), has filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. ConnorsDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
- Kabir v. City of Elk GroveDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Thunderbird Downtown LLC v. Phoenix, City ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020