Legal Opinion

Currigan v. Flor

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 23, 1956No. 17,890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

Defendant in error, herein referred to as plaintiff, brought a declaratory judgment action against plaintiff in error Currigan, as City Auditor, and the City and County of Denver.

It appears that plaintiff was an active member of the Police Department of the City and County of Denver from May 1, 1926, to April 5, 1955, on which date he retired from the department and became entitled to a monthly pension to be paid out of the Denver Police Pension and Relief Fund. Plaintiff in error Currigan, herein referred to as defendant, as Auditor of the City and County of Denver issued and delivered to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roddy v. ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Homan v. MacKeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. State ex rel. Herman v. City of Grand IslandNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  4. State Ex Rel. Harris v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. State Ex Rel. New Washington Oyster Co. v. MeakimWashington Supreme Court · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. RedigerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  2. Currigan v. StoneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  3. Opinion No. 68-364 (1968) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API