Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Harris v. Watson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 18, 1931PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1DissentBrogden, J.

STACY, C. J. concurs in the dissent. This is an action in the nature of a quo warranto brought by the Attorney-General of the State of North Carolina on the complaint of the relator, a citizen of this State, and a resident and taxpayer of Hyde County, to oust the defendant from the office of county commissioner of Hyde County, on the ground that defendant now unlawfully and wrongfully holds and exercises said office. C. S., 870(1).

The facts alleged in the complaint are as follows:

1. At the election held in November, 1930, the defendant, W. W. Watson, was duly elected as a county commissioner…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. State Ex Rel. Barnhill v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. State Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. KnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. State v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Groves v. BardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. County of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Orndorff v. State Ex Rel. McGillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Patten v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Hazen v. National Rifle Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  5. Edwards v. Board of Education of Yancey CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API