Legal Opinion

Laroe Estates, Inc. v. Town of Chester

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 6, 2016No. Docket No. 15-1086-cvPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOHIER, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal we consider whether a proposed intervenor must demonstrate that it has standing even when there is a genuine case or controversy between the existing parties that satisfies the requirements of Article III of the Constitution. The answer is no.

Steven Sherman, a now-deceased land developer, previously sued the Town of Chester (the “Town”) alleging a regulatory taking. That litigation remains pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Ramos, J.). Laroe Estates, Inc. (“Laroe”), a real estate development company, claimed…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Diamond v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. McConnell v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  2. In re Rivada NetworksDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
  3. Sherman v. Town of ChesterDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. City of Syracuse, NY v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and ExplosivesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
  5. City of Syracuse, NY v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and ExplosivesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API