Legal Opinion

Scholl v. Hopper

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 26, 1909PublishedCited by 8 opinions

CASE 13. — SUIT BY WILLIAM HOPPER AGAINST L. F. SCHOLL TO HAVE AN ABSOLUTE DEED DECLARED A MORTGAGE. — Appeal from Eussell Circuit Court. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals.—

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Wm. Rogers Olay, Commissioner

— Reversing.

About 40 years ago Dr. M. D. Hopper and his wife, the mother of appellee, William Hopper, became estranged, and the wife, with Their infant son, William. Hopper, moved from Kentucky to the state of Kansas. Some time thereafter William Hopper was adopted by one Joel Hopper. He grew to manhood out West, and, so far as the record shows, had no com munieation with his father M. D. Hopper. After the departure of his wife Dr. Hopper took his meals at the home of Mrs. Scholl. She was the mother of ap*85pellant, L F. Scholl. When appellant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scanlan v. ScanlanIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Perkins v. DryeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1835
  3. Bright v. WagleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1835

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Roy v. WestCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  2. Bender v. KaelinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  3. Crawford v. StaplesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. Murphy v. BookerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  5. Watkins v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API