Fruehauf Division, Fruehauf Corp. v. Armstrong
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRIST, Presiding Judge.
Claim for benefits under Chapter 288, RSMo.1978, the Missouri Employment Security Law. Charles Armstrong (hereinafter “claimant”) was discharged from Fruehauf Corporation (hereinafter “employer”) upon the ground that he used abusive and obscene language disrupting the orderly conduct of employer’s business. Claimant allegedly used such language as a result of mistreatment by employer in connection with an injury on the job. Claimant denied uttering any obscenities in connection with his alleged mistreatment by employer. Employer’s witnesses, however, testified to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sain v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Lyell v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission, Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Nelson v. LABOR AND INDUS. REL. COM'NMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Cullors v. Missouri Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kansas City Club v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Powell v. Division of Employment Security, Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Yoldash v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Laclede Gas Co. v. Labor & Industrial Relations Com.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Croy v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.