United States v. Arthur
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Homer Ferguson, Judge:
The single issue in this ease is whether the staff judge advocate’s review was sufficient. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we conclude that it was not.
The accused was convicted of five specifications framed in violation of several articles of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The post-trial review contained a complete summary of the evidence adduced at trial, together with an extensive discussion of various legal issues which were raised. In a subsequent portion of the review entitled “Conclusion,” there is found the following statement: “The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. FieldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. HowesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. AckerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. McQuaidUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. DunnUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. MurphyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958