Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Newmann v. Mapama Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 18, 1983Published

1ConcurrenceSilverman, J.

Quite apart from the expiration of the lease, plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction was properly denied. I agree with Special Term that plaintiffs have an adequate remedy if they are sued in the Civil Court, and therefore, there is no need for a declaratory judgment or an injunction in plaintiffs’ favor. The injunction sought is a so-called Yellowstone injunction (First Nat. Stores v Yellowstone Shopping Center, 21 NY2d 630). Typically such injunctions have *796been issued in cases where the landlord claims there has been a breach of some covenant in the lease; the tenant disputes it;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. First National Stores, Inc. v. Yellowstone Shopping Center, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Wuertz v. CowneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Podolsky v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Nunez v. 164 Prospect Park West Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API