Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Shields

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1909No. 7554PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Whatcom county, Neterer, J., entered April 6, 1908, -refusing to vacate a judgment of dismissal, after a hearing upon affidavits.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

— This is an appeal from an order refusing to vacate a judgment of voluntary nonsuit and reinstate the case for trial. The facts are about as follows: The action was brought to recover $258, being the balance due upon a note given for $458, upon which a payment of $200 was made on November 1, 1901. The answer alleged the payment in full of the note. The case was set down for trial on Monday, *464April 6, 1908. The attorneys for the plaintiff were Million & Houser, of Seattle, and Parrott & Griswold, local counsel. The affidavit for continuance shows that the plaintiff’s case was in charge of E.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Myers v. LandrumWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Sanborn, Vail & Co. v. Centralia Furniture Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goodman v. GordonArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Ryan v. Phoenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Zimmerman v. Western Builders & Salvage Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Ex Parte CavenessCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API