Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Caveness

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 22, 1909No. 169PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Application by S. B. Caveness for writ of habeas corpus to obtain reduction of bail.

1Per curiam

Petitioner alleges that he is unlawfully imprisoned at Tecumseh, in Pottawatomie county; that petitioner has been tried and convicted of the crime of violating the prohibition law in six cases; that his bail is fixed at the excessive and unreasonable amount of $250 in each ease, making the total bail in the sum of $1,500. It is further averred that petitioner’s imprisonment is illegal in this: That the verdict and judgment in each of said cases is illegal and unauthorized by law, because the sales which it is claimed were made by petitioner of intoxicating liquors, and upon which he was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re McNaughtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Anderson v. ShieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TidwellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Ex Parte MartindaleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Ex Parte Charles F. SneedCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Ex Parte AndrewsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Ex Parte BakerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API