Legal Opinion

William Wicke Co. v. Kaldenberg Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 15, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

'Appeal by defendant from judgment of the Sixth District Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The-action was to recover the rent of a loft in the factory building of the plaintiff, Nos. 402, 404 and 406 East Thirty-second street, this city, for the months of January, February and March, 1897.

It appears that on December 25, 1896, a fire occurred in the premises Eos. 209 and 211 East Thirty-third street, which had up to that time been occupied by the defendant, and in consequence certain machinery and other property of the defendant were carried to the street, where they remained exposed to the elements.

In the latter part of December, 1896, a young man called upon Mr. Wicke, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Commercial Bank of Buffalo v. . WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  3. Lee v. Pittsburgh Coal & Mining Co.The Superior Court of New York City · 1877
  4. Wilbur v. CollinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Franke v. HewittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. Hellman v. HellmanNew York Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Snowber v. LoebAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API