Legal Opinion

Snowber v. Loeb

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 15, 1912Published

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Mew York, borough of Manhattan, third district, entered in favor of the plaintiffs after a trial by the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

The action was to recover rent for the months of June, July, August and September for premises consisting of one-half of a store, at a monthly rental of eighty dollars. The facts are as follows: On February 25, 1911, the parties signed the'following writing:

“ This agreement between Snowber & Smith and Moe Loeb of City of Mew York in which it is understood that the said Moe Loeb does léase the Merth Half of the -store 2190 Broadway from the 1st day of March, 1911, to the 1st day of October 1911, at the annual rent of Mine Hundred and Sixty Dollars ($960) dollars payable in equal monthly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Gray v. Kaufman Dairy & Ice Cream Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. People v. . St. Nicholas BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. People v. Saint Nicholas BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Marcus v. Collins Building & Construction Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API