Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Kaufman & Broad Home Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 3, 2001No. B139140PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff homeowners appeal the denial of their motion for class certification in this action against a developer and general contractor for the cost of repairing or replacing defective concrete foundations under their homes. We hold a class action may be maintained as to the claims for breach of express and implied warranty. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s order in part and remand the cause with directions.

Facts and Proceedings Below

Plaintiffs Hicks and Gonzales purchased and continue to own homes built and sold by defendant Kaufman and Broad Home…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. J'Aire Corp. v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Birdsong v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Margie Daniel v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Shuette v. Beazer Homes Holdings Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API