Legal Opinion
Jennings v. Edwards
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided July 18, 1978No. C-76-638-WSPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HIRAM H. WARD, District Judge.
This matter came on for hearing before the Court on May 26,1978, upon motions by plaintiff and defendant Forsyth Bank for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff asserts that she is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law, and defendant Bank, in addition to opposing her motion, moves for summary judgment in its own favor. 1
Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56(c), Federal Rules of Civil…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Garza v. Chicago Health Clubs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- Norlinda D. Philbeck v. Timmers Chevrolet, Inc. And General Motors Acceptance Corporation,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Cheryl A. Meyers, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Clearview Dodge Sales, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross Chrysler Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Glaire v. La Lanne-Paris Health Spa, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Manning v. Princeton Consumer Discount Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- James A. Rudisell v. The Fifth Third BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Fort v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1981
- Boncyk v. Cavanaugh MotorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Ringenback v. Crabtree Cadillac-Oldsmobile, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Childs v. Ford Motor Credit Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.