Legal Opinion

Washington Dehydrated Food Co. v. Triton Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1929No. 21636. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This is an action to recover for failure to deliver merchandise alleged to have been purchased! by the plaintiff from the defendant under a written memorandum, duly signed by the party to be charged. The case was tried to the court sitting without a jury, resulting in findings favorable to the plaintiff, and a judgment thereon for $2,472.96 and costs, from which judgment the defendant has appealed.

The controlling facts are substantially as follows: On July 29, 1927, a Mr. Cardiff, the president of the respondent corporation, met Mr. Pettigrew, the secretary and managing officer of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. W. E. Moses Land Scrip & Realty Co. v. Stack-Gibbs Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Gile v. TsutakawaWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Nut House v. Pacific Oil MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Fuller v. OstruskeWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Bharat Overseas Ltd. v. Dulien Steel Products, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hankins v. American Pacific Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. Shapleigh Inv. Co. v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API