Wallace v. State

HILL, Justice.

[T1] Shane Cody Wallace appeals the district court's finding that a deputy did not lack reasonable suspicion to detain him and his vehicle for a dog sniff. Arguing only under the United States Constitution, Wallace contends that the deputy impermissibly expanded the scope of an otherwise lawful stop by requesting the narcotic detection dog. We affirm.

ISSUE

[¶2] Wallace states the single issue as follows:

Mr. Wallace's Fourth Amendment Rights were violated when law enforcement extended a traffic stop without reasonable suspicion.

The State posits the issue this way:

Thirteen minutes…