Legal Opinion

Frazier v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 2010No. S-09-0205PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Appellant, Matthew Robert Frazier, entered a conditional plea of guilty to one count of possessing marijuana with the intent to deliver. He reserved the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Mr. Frazier maintains that evidence obtained in the search of the vehicle should have been suppressed because no reasonable suspicion existed to detain him for a dog sniff of his vehicle following the conclusion of a traffic stop. We find no error and affirm.

ISSUE

[¶ 2] Mr. Frazier presents one issue: Did the trial court abuse its discretion and commit…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. Terry L. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  4. O'BOYLE v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Damato v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Property Seized From Robert Pardee, Robert PardeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. Joy Klomliam v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Bryan Robinson v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Kellon Christon Pryce v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Tiernan v. State, Department of TransportationWyoming Supreme Court · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API