Legal Opinion

Carter v. Three Unknown Police Officers of the Wilmington Police Department

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided July 18, 1986No. Civ. A. No. 81-228 LONPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LONGOBARDI, District Judge.

Detective Randolph Martin has moved to dismiss the civil rights complaint brought against him by Plaintiff Richard Carter. Martin asserts four specific reasons why the case should be dismissed. They are (1) Carter’s failure to serve Martin with process within the time period prescribed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(j); (2) the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over Detective Martin; (3) the action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations; and (4) Plaintiff fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

The factual background of this case is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Stephen Borzeka v. Margaret O. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Fitzgerald v. LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. Betlyon v. ShyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1983
  5. Herbert Feist v. Jefferson County Commissioners CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burgos Martinez v. Rivera OrtizDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API