Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Thomas

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 31, 1991No. 9509PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Landau J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court awarding the plaintiff compensatory-damages in the amount of $45,800. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) concluded that the oral partnership agreement claimed by the plaintiff was not within the statute of frauds, (2) allowed the plaintiffs expert to testify as to the damages suffered by the plaintiff, and (3) precluded the defendant from introducing evidence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

This action for a breach of an oral partnership agreement to purchase and to rehabilitate…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Struckman v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Barry v. Posi-Seal International, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  2. Borkowski v. SachetiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. In re Adalberto S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  4. Schnabel v. TylerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  5. Lightsey v. MarshallNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API