Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. State Insurance Compensation Fund

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 6, 1922No. 10,083PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Proceeding under the workmen’s compensation act. Award of the industrial commission set aside by the district court. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Clarence J. Morley, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

The claimant, William Grenfell, lost the sight of his left eye by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with The Camp Bird Mining Company. The accident occurred March 16th, 1916, and the cause is governed by the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1915. In conformity therewith, and upon an agreement between the parties approved by the Commission no hearing whatever having been had, Grenfell was awarded $832.00 for the loss only of one eye.

It appears that in 1908, while employed at another mine, Grenfell suffered an injury to the right eye, which resulted - finally in a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Branconnier's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Industrial Commission v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  3. Thompson v. KnappMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Employers' Mutual Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. New York Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  2. Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. BacaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Knoxville Knitting Mills Co. v. GalyonTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  5. Calumet Foundry & Machine Co. v. MrozIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API