Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Galton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 1978No. 124-340, CA 9374PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.

In this will contest, the probate court found that the testatrix was unduly influenced and lacked testamentary capacity at the time of the execution of the second codicil to her will, but that her first codicil was free from influence. Contestants appeal the ruling on the first codicil and proponents cross-appeal on the decision regarding the second codicil.

As each undue influence or testamentary capacity will contest case must be decided under its own peculiar circumstances, Kastner v. Husband, 231 Or 133, 135-36, 372 P2d 520 (1962), a recitation of the relevant facts is in order.

Ethel P.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of ReddawayOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Clauder v. MorserOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Estate of AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  4. In Re Will of Robert CarrOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Kastner v. HusbandOregon Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hurd v. MosbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. Matter of Estate of YettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API