Legal Opinion

Hurd v. Mosby

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 18, 1980No. 129 465, CA 14840PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

The issue on appeal in this will contest case is whether testatrix, Lena L. Unger, had sufficient testamentary capacity to execute a last will and testament on February 25,1976. This was tried as a suit in equity and our review is de novo. Former ORS 113.055(4).1 The probate court found that testatrix had sufficient testamentary capacity. We disagree.

The requirements of testamentary capacity were summarized in Kastner v. Husband, 231 Or 133, 136, 372 P2d 520 (1962), as follows:

"* * * q) the person must be able to understand the nature of the act in which he is engaged; (2) know the nature and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clauder v. MorserOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. In Re Walther's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Estate of Verd Hill v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Turney v. StoneOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Trombly v. McKenney, Ex.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bigej v. BoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. Hurd v. MosbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Perry v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API