Legal Opinion

James v. McDonald

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1949No. File No. 9078PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. 1'he single question presented is whether an employer-employee relationship existed between L. H. McDonald and the deceased, Wally James. The Industrial Commissioner determined that James was an employee of McDonald, the circuit court reversed and held that James was not an employee.

At the hearing before the Industrial Commissioner, L. H. McDonald was the only witness and testified substantially to the following facts: McDonald is engaged in the general trucking business at Rapid City. He holds a Class B authority from the South Dakota Public Utilities…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hillen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Taylor v. Blackwell Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Williams Construction Co. v. BohlenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  4. Edge v. City of PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Williams v. BranumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Egemo v. FloresSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Harry L. Young & Sons, Inc. v. AshtonUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Howe v. Farmers Cooperative Creamery of MadisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Campbell v. City of ChamberlainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Brix v. General Accident & Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API