Sudler v. Danberg
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Benjamin J. Sudler (“Plaintiff’), an inmate at the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center (“VCC”), filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He appears pro se and has paid the filing fee. 1 (D.I. 5.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court will dismiss the claims against Defendants Carl Danberg (“Dan-berg”) and Perry Phelps (“Phelps”) as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l), and will allow Plaintiff to proceed against Defendant Correctional Medical System (“CMS”).
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff alleges that Defendants are…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- (PC) Hammler v. HernandezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Stenseth v. AlthoffDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2025