Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Stenseth v. Althoff

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided September 10, 2025No. 4:24-cv-04197Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION ROBERT A. STENSETH; and 4:24-CV-04197-CCT MICHELLE STENSETH, Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ vs. MOTIONS TO DISMISS MATT ALTHOFF, Secretary of Social Services, State of South Dakota; NATE SCHEMA, C.E.O., Good Samaritan Society; and KELLIE WASKO, Secretary, South Dakota Department of Corrections, Defendants. Plaintiffs, Robert A. Stenseth and Michelle Stenseth, filed a pro se lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Docket 1. Both Robert and Michelle filed motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Dockets 2, 3, and 7.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API