Legal Opinion

State v. Burgess

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 20, 1977No. 7620SC774PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Defendant brings forward one assignment of error, the failure of the trial court to dismiss the charge on the ground that procedural statutes, G.S. 15A-511 and G.S. 15A-601, had not been followed and “to condone non-compliance would result in an injustice.”

G.S. 15A-511(a) requires a law-enforcement officer making an arrest to take the arrested person “without unnecessary delay before a magistrate.” The former statute, G.S. 15-46, required that the person arrested be “immediately” taken before a magistrate. The State Supreme Court has held that G.S. 15-46 did not prescribe…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. McCloudSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. BroomeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. AbleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. FoustCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Matter of BullaboughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. PruittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API