Legal Opinion

In re Grand Jury Investigation

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 26, 1970No. Misc. No. 70-140PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TROUTMAN, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is a petition by the United States for an order to hold Stanford Frank, a witness, in civil contempt for refusing to obey an order of this Court granting him immunity from prosecution and directing him to answer questions propounded to him during a Grand Jury inquiry into possible violations of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951 and the Taft-Hartley Act, 29 U.S.C. § 186(b). Mr. Frank challenges the validity of this Court’s original order granting the immunity and compelling him to testify. He contends that the proceedings upon which the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Ullmann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Reina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. James H. Ellis, Jr. v. United States of America, Alfred M. Watkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  5. Stevens v. MarksSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sherrie Bursey and Brenda Joyce Presley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. Di MauroCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  3. Martorano AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. In Re Grand Jury Investigation. United States of America v. Frank BergerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  5. In Re Grand Jury Investigation. United States of America v. Frank BergerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API