Potter v. Continental Trailways, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KANE, Judge.
Potter seeks relief from Continental Trailway’s alleged violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Continental has moved to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment on the grounds that Potter failed to comply with the requirements of 29 U.S.C. § 626(d)(1) and to join an indispensable party whose joinder is not feasible.
I
This is not the first time that this question has been presented. In his original complaint, Potter alleged that “[0]n . September 15,1975, defendant refused to hire plaintiff solely because of his age.”…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Emra Joseph Bonham v. Dresser Industries, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Anne M. DARTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Marlowe v. Fisher BodyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Shell Oil Co. v. DarttSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- W. B. COKE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Kazanzas v. Walt Disney World Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Munoz v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1986
- Brenimer v. Great Western Sugar Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1983
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. JBS USA, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.