Legal Opinion
State of Ariz. v. Motorola, Inc.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 20, 1992No. CIV 89-1700-PHX-CAMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MUECKE, District Judge.
Having considered all the briefing filed with regard to defendants’ joint motion for partial summary judgment regarding divisibility of alleged harm, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument 1 , follows: and concludes as
BACKGROUND
In October 1989, the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (“ADEQ”) and the City of Phoenix (“City”) filed suit against sixteen separate defendants, seeking to recover approximately $54 million in cleanup costs incurred or to be incurred as a result of the toxic wastes found…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Chem-Dyne Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Akzo Coatings, Inc. v. Aigner Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994