Edge v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
The dispositive question before this court on this appeal is whether the trial judge abused his discretion in ordering a new trial. We hold that he did not, that the various other issues argued by the parties are not before us, and dismiss the appeal.
The facts giving rise to the present appeal are, briefly summarized, as follows: plaintiff Sandra Edge had a miscarriage in 1977 and thereafter consulted a physician in an effort to determine why, despite their continuing efforts, she and her husband, plaintiff Bias Edge, did not conceive a third child. In May 1980, the Edges…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Worthington v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Bird v. Bradburn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Goldston v. ChambersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- In Re WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Scott v. TrogdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
3Cited by5 opinions
- Strickland v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Couch v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- In re S.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- Page v. BoylesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Pipkin v. PipkinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006