Legal Opinion

Randall v. State

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On indictment for larceny. On error to the Sussex Quarter Sessions.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

The plaintiff in error' was indicted, tried and convicted, in the General Quarter Sessions of Sussex county* for larceny, and now presents several reasons for reversal of the judgment.

The first is, that the grand jury, by which the indictment. was found, was legally a part of the Court of Oyer and Terminer, and, therefore, was incompetent to find an 'indictment in the Quarter Sessions.

The facts disclosed by the return to- the writ of error are* that the grand jury was returned by the sheriff into the Oyer and Terminer, at the opening of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. ButtsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API