Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Robinson Roofing & Rem., Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 3, 1997No. 1960679PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant, Robinson Roofing Remodeling, Inc., appealed from the trial court's denial of its Rule 60(b), Ala.R.Civ.P., motion to set aside a default judgment entered against it and in favor of the plaintiff, Mike Clayton. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed, without an opinion, Robinson Roofing Remodeling, Inc. v. Clayton (No. 2951297), 696 So.2d 1097 (Ala.Civ.App. 1996) (table). We granted certiorari review. The dispositive issue is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the defendant's Rule 60(b)(6) motion. We reverse and remand.

Clayton's complaint alleged breach of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Howell v. D.H. Holmes, Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Ex Parte WaldropSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. A-OK CONST. v. Castle Const.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Phillips v. JohnsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  2. Oliver v. TownsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Robinson v. HowellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  4. Ex Parte Mountain Pointe Development Grp., 2100892 (ala.civ.app. 9-2-2011)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  5. Oliver v. TownsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API