Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Waldrop

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 9, 1981No. 79-530PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The decision of the Court of Civil Appeals, 395 So.2d 60, is affirmed. However, we cannot agree with statements in the opinion which seem to suggest that under no circumstances may a judgment be set aside after the expiration of three years. As we recently held in Harrison v. Harrison, [MS. October 3, 1980] (Ala. 1980), a judgment procured by fraud on the court itself may be set aside by any court, trial or appellate, on its own motion, even after three years. See, likewise, Hartigan v.Hartigan, 272 Ala. 67, 128 So.2d 725 (1961), and Crisco v.Crisco, 294 Ala. 168, 313 So.2d 529 (1975).

Rule 60…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartigan v. HartiganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. Crisco v. CriscoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Waldrop v. WaldropCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. G.J. v. W.J.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Coburn v. CoburnCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  3. McBrayer v. Hokes Bluff Auto PartsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  4. Bates v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  5. E.S.R. v. Madison County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API