Weissman v. Henkin
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
Defendant’s business, over a period of years, was that of securing subscriptions to a wide variety of trade journals — perhaps as many as 150 different publications. On March 30, 1940, plaintiff bought a one-half interest in the business from defendant at an agreed price of |2,250, and a partnership was formed by them to continue the business under the name of “Trade Journal Service.” Each agreed to devote his whole time in the interests of the partnership. Attached to the written agreement is defendant’s affidavit that “there are no creditors of the business conducted by”…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kelley v. ShaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Moffett v. PeirceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Weiss v. First Nat. Bk. of ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fortugno v. Hudson Manure Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Hankin v. HankinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Jay v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Wiese v. WieseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.