Legal Opinion
Robert G. COURTNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BIOSOUND, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 13, 1994No. 93-3733PublishedCited by 149 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
Robert G. Courtney brought this action against his former employer, Biosound, Inc., under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 626(c), alleging that Biosound failed to rehire him because of his age. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Biosound, concluding that Courtney failed to produce evidence from which a finder of fact could reasonably conclude that the reasons proffered for the refusal to rehire were pretextual. We reverse and remand.
I. Background
Biosound markets ultrasound, cardiovascular imaging and electrocardiography…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- Barbara Payne v. Michael PauleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Nicholas A. CHIARAMONTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FASHION BED GROUP, INC., a DIVISION OF LEGGETT & PLATT, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Larry D. Drake and Rosalie E. Drake v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Janine Rudin v. Lincoln Land Community CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Douglas M. Mills v. Health Care Service CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.