Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dakota Central Telephone Co. v. City of Huron

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Original application for mandamus by the State, on the relation of the Dakota Central Telephone Company and another, against the City of Huron, and the Mayor and City Council thereof.

1Opinion of the CourtHaney, P. J.

It appears from the application in this original' special proceeding that in 1898 the defendant city by ordinance granted to one J. W. L. Zietlow, his successors and assigns, the right to construct and maintain through and upon its streets, alleys, and public grounds all poles, posts, and appliances necessary and proper for supplying to its citizens communication by telephone, subject to the conditions expressed therein, the right thus granted being expressly limited to a term of 10 years from and after the passage of the ordinance; that thereafter, and in 1898, Zietlow constructed and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Everitt v. Board County CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  2. City of Huron v. CampbellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Dickson v. DowsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Vine v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Bank of Scotland v. BlissSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. GundersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Board of Railroad CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Stanley County v. Jackson CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Brandon Sav. Bank v. SwansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  5. C., M., St. P. P.R. Co. v. R.R. Commrs.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API