Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Board of Railroad Commissioners

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1936No. File No. 7852PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'CAMPBELL, J.

Purporting to act pursuant to the provisions of section 9773, R. C. 1919, as superceded by chapter 251, § 4, Laws 19-23, amended by chapter 261, Laws 1925, defendant Board of Railroad Commissioners held a hearing and made and entered an order fixing the sum of $40 per annum as a reasonable rental to be paid to plaintiff by the Plankinton Cooperative Elevator Company for an elevator site on plaintiff’s right o-f way in the town of Plankinton in Aurora co-unty, S'.. D. Plaintiff applied to the board for rehearing pursuant to section 9590, R. C. 1919, as amended by section 1, -c.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State Ex Rel. Botkin v. WelshSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Everitt v. Board County CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Clemmons v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Murphy v. Standard Oil Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Darnall v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Application of Dakota Transp. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Bandy v. MickelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  4. C., M., St. P. P.R. Co. v. Bd. Commrs.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Board of Railroad CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API