Legal Opinion

Rouse v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 11, 1953No. [No. 148, October Term, 1952.]PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

The appellant, Walter Rouse, was indicted on the charge of conspiring with William Adams from August 1, 1947 to August 15, 1951, and “with certain other persons to the jurors unknown, unlawfully to violate the Lottery Laws of the State of Maryland.”

The appellant prayed a severance, and Adams elected to be tried by the Court sitting without a jury, and was found guilty. His appeal was heard and determined just prior to this appeal on issues not here raised. See Adams v. State, 202 Md. 455, 97 A. 2d 281.

The jury found the appellant guilty. Judgment and sentence and this appeal followed.

At the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Gavieres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Sealfon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. United States v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. United States v. RabinowichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. IngenitoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Cousins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Cook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API