Legal Opinion

Epstein v. Celotex Corporation

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided February 14, 1968PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARVEL, Vice Chancellor:

The amended complaint in this action, the allegations of which are stated to be true solely on the information and belief of plaintiff’s attorney, avers that plaintiff is the owner of shares of common stock of the defendant The South Coast Corporation “ * * * and has been such at all times stated herein * * * Plaintiff also claims to be the owner of shares of common stock of the defendant South Shore Oil & Development Company and avers that he “ * * * has been such 1 indirectly through (South) Coast at all times stated herein and directly since on or about February 9,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
  3. In Re the General Realty & Utilities Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1947
  4. Eastern States Petroleum Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1939
  5. Du Pont v. Du PontCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Vickers Energy Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  2. Tanzer v. International General Industries, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1979
  3. David J. Greene & Co. v. Dunhill International, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1968
  4. Valente v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1978
  5. Lynch v. Vickers Energy CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API