Sinclair Refining Co. v. Schaff
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Kansas; John C. Pollock, Judge. Action at law by Charles E. Schaff, receiver of the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway, against the Sinclair Refining Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, District Judge.
In the court below this cause was submitted upon a stipulation filed by the parties, in which it is agreed that the allegations of fact contained in the amended petition of the plaintiff, Charles E. Schaff, receiver for the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway, are true, and that the allegations of fact contained in the affirmative defense set up in the answer of the defendant, Sinclair Refining Company, are true.
From the amended petition of the plaintiff it appears that under tariffs duly published and filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission certain demurrage…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- The Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Davis v. Keystone Steel & Wire Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. BoardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Foley v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.