Legal Opinion
Foley v. Chicago Great Western Railroad
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided January 17, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoRLing, J.
The defendant made an excursion rate, schedule for which was approved by and filed with the interstate commerce commission. By this schedule the plaintiff’s ticket was good only on train No. 16, which left Omaha in the morning. It was not good on No. 12, from which plaintiff was ejected. Plaintiff claims that he was not informed of that fact, and that no schedules were posted in the depot at Manning. The ticket showed no limitation to any particular train.
The provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act (8 U. S. Comp. Stat. 1916, Section 8569 et seq., Ü. S. Comp Stat. 1916, 1923 Supplement,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Esteve Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- American Railway Express Co. v. LindenburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Calveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WoodburySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Ry. Express Co. v. American Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- Gegere v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Jackson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- The Pullman Company v. Anderson, AdministratorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943