Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. United Dredging Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 1, 1926No. 4835PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Circuit Judge.

The city of Los Angeles and certain of its officials appeal from a decree enjoining and restraining them from enforcing as against appellee, the United Dredging Company, a Delaware corporation, the provisions of an ordinance of the city.

The ordinance makes it a misdemeanor to operate steam boilers and appliances without first having submitted the same to inspection and procuring a Ecense from a local board of mechanical engineers, and to employ or permit any person to use and operate the same other than an engineer duly Ecensed by such board.

Appellee was operating steam…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Prigg v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  3. Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Saylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1896
  5. The AlabamaUnited States Circuit Court · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Norton v. Warner Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Kibadeaux v. Standard Dredging Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  4. Walling v. W. D. Haden Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  5. Don W. Kathriner v. Unisea, Inc., a Washington CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API