Legal Opinion

The Alabama

United States Circuit Court

Decided November 15, 1884PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Admiralty Appoal.

1Opinion of the CourtP abuse, J.

Under the agreed statement of facts in this case, the contract to tow the steam dredge-boat Alabama and the two scows from the port of Mobile to Tampa bay was a maritime contract, and *450the services rendered by the tug-boat Mary B. Curtis in so towing the dredge-boat and scows to Tampa bay were, without doubt, maritime services. Prom these maritime services resulted a lien, the character of which depends upon the question whether or not the dredge-boat and scows should be classed as a ship or ships. If they were not a ship or ships, but only movable property, then only the carrier’s lien…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The Rock Island BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. The Steamer St. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  3. The KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. The Bird of ParadiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. The Hezekiah BaldwinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1876

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Saylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1896
  2. Thompson Towing & Wrecking Ass'n v. McGregorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
  3. McRae v. Bowers Dredging Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1898
  4. Charles Barnes Co. v. One Dredge BoatDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1909
  5. In re Hydraulic Steam Dredge No. 1Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1897

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API