Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Rubey

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 2013No. 20130093PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Larry Gene Rubey appeals from a district court order limiting the presentation of evidence at his discharge hearing and from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. Rubey argues the district court erred in restricting the evidence and finding he remained a sexually dangerous individual. We affirm the district court’s order that Rubey remained a sexually dangerous individual and deny Rubey’s requested relief on the evidentiary limitation.

I

[¶ 2] Rubey was convicted of gross sexual imposition in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Cass County State's Attorney v. E.W.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Williston Farm Equipment, Inc. v. Steiger Tractor, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Erickson v. RubeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Gorsuch v. GorsuchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bell State Bank & Trust v. OaklandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Erickson v. RubeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. BeltranNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API